As admin of an organization, I'd like to create groups and associate users to those groups. Something like @dev or @designer or whatever I need.

As user, I'd like to notificate only people of a specific groups by using the group name: "hey @devs, can you check this out!"

If a user puts a hyperlink after a series of periods there is no hyperlink added to that url.

I can see that there is a slight difference between the highlighting of the icon for the current flow and other available flows, but it's too subtle.

Perhaps the background-color of the other flows (but not their text) could be 50% opaque, rather than 80%?

Current parser that is used to find and highlight are pretty stupid (e.g. compared to one used by stackexchange websites) and it does not respect IDNA.

Please fix this.

I don't know if it already exist, but i'd like to disable the notifications on a specific chat, except when I'm mention.

It would be nice to show a small version of the user's icon (gravatar) next to their name inline with chat messages. Or at least have an option to do so.

I have like 40 people I chat with for work. It would be helpful if I could categorize them, by the conversations I'm going to have. In practice, that means categorizing them by job. If I could just have a folder, or a drop-down list of some kind, it would be easy for me to put people there and name the group myself.

As an administrator I would like to be able to audit the users' account usage so I can take decisions on the licensing area.

On a mac: when a notification appears that someone has sent me a message/posted a message and I click on the notification, the app needs to open even if it has been minimized or is on another desktop screen.

Flowdock is cool, you support a TON of integration points and that leads to a lot of filters on the left and side.

Can you give me the ability to hide filters that I will not hook up. It just adds to the confusion when I am looking fos a specific filter.

As an automated process, when sending messages to a flow via the POST api, it would be nice to have the response packet return the message_id of the new flow, so that the same process can respond with status updates related to the original message.

Is there a way to have pivotal tasks push out to multiple flows?

Beanstalk supports only one webhook per repository. If a repository already uses webhook for other purpose, it's impossible to integrate with flowdock. Beanstalk supports implementing a more "native" integration.

Flows listed in the primary list (for users to join) should be listed alphabetically or the user should have the option to sort them multiple ways

make it easier to add attachments to a discussion - I want to be able to paste an image or drag and drop attachments.

First off... love Flowdock! One of the best tools I use. With that out of the way...

I think it would be great to be able to set an expiration time/date on a post after which it is destroyed. This would allow posting of usernames and passwords (or other sensitive info) in the Flow without having to worry that they are forever available and searchable.

If I enter a /status message into a chat, and then press the up key to edit it, Flowdock shows some (random? the first message I've sent today? I'm not sure) message I've sent previously in place of the status message. I can't actually edit the message at all.